Inhaling large amounts of nicotine and heavy metals from e-cigarettes can cause identical heart and lung damage as smoking conventional cigarettes, according to a mountain of data published in recent years.
Researchers are already highlighting the risks of secondhand nicotine vapour, which is likely what led to Alabama’s recent ban on vaping in vehicles containing children under the age of 14.
However, as millions of employees would attest, their coworkers continue to vape in large numbers at workplaces across the nation, including offices and other settings like bars and restaurants.
According to experts, society has been reluctant to realise that these devices pose a significant risk to people’s health.
Nearly 62 percent of employees report seeing coworkers vape covertly at work on a daily basis.
According to a research in the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 76% of e-cigarette users admitted to vaping at the office.
This is a serious worry. Vaping byproducts that become aerosolized contaminate the surrounding air and could put workers in danger. Moreover, a vape-free workplace is supported by 74% of non-vapers, who are tired of it. At least 53% of vapers support a ban on smoking within the workplace.
Those findings are only one of many indicating an increasing belief that vaping should be prohibited at work, in bars, and in restaurants, even if this isn’t the case in many areas.
‘The fact that they’re using these indoors, it’s really troubling to hear about, and that workplaces are just turning a blind eye to this, because it’s not appropriate to allow vaping indoors,’ said Thomas Carr, the Director of National Policy at the American Lung Association, to DailyMail.com.
When workers returned to their physical offices after the epidemic, the widespread usage of the device was undoubtedly aided by the change to full-time work from home, where they could vape without disturbing those around them.
Not being in a workplace, Mr. Carr said, and not understanding some of the standards that must be upheld there as well as the fact that other people are bothered by your vaping. Because there are probably workers in the locations where this is taking place who are accepting it either in silence or perhaps even out loud. And I believe the issue is that nothing is being done to address it.
More than 78 percent of respondents to a study taken in the autumn of 2018 said they generally agreed with the idea of keeping tobacco items out of sight in places where kids can shop. More than 63 percent of people were in favour of outright banning the sale of flavoured e-cigarettes.
The majority of participants, or 76%, also favoured banning the use of e-cigarettes in bars, 83 % preferred a ban in all indoor public spaces, including workplaces and casinos, and 87 % preferred a ban in dining establishments.
It is often acceptable for employees to use vapes at their workstations because there are few regulations restricting their use in the workplace.
According to Dr. Ashley Merianos, a professor at the University of Cincinnati with experience in tobacco control, the absence of firm regulations is a problem: If there is no specific policy addressing vaping, there may be uncertainty regarding whether vapes are covered by smoke-free policies in work places, especially since these products were introduced to the market after combustible tobacco products.
It is advised that companies implement a stringent, comprehensive tobacco-free policy that addresses both combustible and non-combustible tobacco products, including vapes, even if there is no tobacco-free law that forbids smoking in the workplace.
But as a growing body of scientific data indicates, vaping may be just as hazardous to one’s heart and lung health as cigarette smoking, the days of being able to puff on e-cigarettes in pubs, casinos, college campuses, and workplaces may be coming to an end.
Over the past ten years, there has been a noticeable shift in societal perceptions of vaping and how harmless—or harmful—it may be.
The shift in viewpoint was partially prompted by an outbreak of e-cigarette or vaping-use-associated lung damage (EVALI), which started in 2019 and resulted in more than 2,800 hospitalisations and 68 fatalities by February 2020.
According to Dr. Jason Rose, a doctor who specialises in lung injuries, the EVALI outbreak of 2019 was the catalyst for the public to become aware of the risks associated with vaping.
“That did lead to a situation where it became widely known that, hey, you know, these might not be entirely safe,” he said. And at that point, it undoubtedly occurred to you that these things might potentially lead to a problem—a very real problem.
“These products actually came out 10, 15, or more years ago; increased publicity only recently.”
According to a recent American Heart Association report co-authored by Dr. Rose, vaping devices contain a combination of nicotine, thickeners, solvents, and flavours that are likely to pose the same serious risks to cardiovascular health as smoking regular cigarettes, including raising blood pressure and heart rate.
However, it will likely be years before the full scope of the health effects caused by vaping, such as the increased risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), is known.
In the past 120 years, biomedical science and research have evolved substantially, according to Dr. Rose. I believe we have historical experience with the [health risks of] combustible cigarettes, which we can draw from to try and gain a better understanding of the effects of these vaping practises.
We must plan our studies carefully because we are unable to establish a conclusive link between product usage and COPD, which takes decades to do. They’ve only been available for ten, fifteen years.
Additionally, secondhand aerosols from high-nicotine vape products are not as harmless as originally believed, despite not containing the hundreds of carcinogens created as a consequence of burning tobacco in cigarettes.
A Juul or a PuffBar can emit plumes that smell pleasant, sweet, or completely unappealing, which scientists believe has given users a false sense of security.
Particulate matter, which is so fine it can cause respiratory problems and enter the bloodstream when inhaled, is emitted by vapes at 22 times the safe limit.
‘I would say we don’t have a lot of data on the health hazards for inhaling secondhand vaping products,’ Dr. Rose added. I believe it is wise to have restrictions that are similar to those that apply to other inhaled tobacco products (such as not permitting smoking in most enclosed workplaces).
In a different 2019 study published in the International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, the researchers aimed to assess the long-term effects of inhaling second-hand e-cigarette aerosol after exposure for roughly six hours at vaping events.
After visiting in-person conferences where they were surrounded by vapour, researchers discovered that 28 persons who did not frequently vape saw an increase in chemical markers from exposure to nicotine and tobacco in the environment.
But they didn’t vape themselves. However, their bodies displayed evidence of nicotine intake and its metabolization.
Cotinine and trans-3′-hydroxycotinine levels were higher in their urine than in their spit, but cotinine, trans-3′-hydroxycotinine, 3-HPMA, and CEMA levels were higher. And depending on how long it had been since the conferences, different concentrations of each were present.
The results suggested that even without using an e-cigarette, being around them can still result in greater levels of these chemicals in the body.
Additionally, they rip a huge hole in the claim made by millions of vapers that passive inhalation of the vapour produced by the devices must be safe because it does not leave the pungent odour of a typical cigarette behind.
With this mounting data, more individuals are becoming aware of this widespread myth and are prepared to reevaluate social standards around vaping.
More state and local officials are enforcing various restrictions on where individuals can vape as the body of research grows.
In 2017, New York officially outlawed vaping inside by including it in the Clean Indoor Air Act. Similar restrictions have been passed in a number of states, the majority of which are Democrat-run.
Vaping was outlawed in indoor public spaces, including workplaces, in California in 2016. Similar restrictions were enacted in Illinois in 2014 and New Jersey in 2010.
The most recent state to outlaw indoor vaping was Delaware in 2019.
More states and municipalities are anticipated to implement regulations banning the use of vaping devices indoors as more evidence of their harmful effects, as well as the aerosol they emit, comes to light.